British Foreign Secretary addresses Global Tamil Forum against Lanka’s displeasure
British Foreign Secretary David Miliband has participated today and addressed the Global Tamil Forum meet, even as the Sri Lanka government protested his participation in the meet and wanted to keep him away, creating further sour in the relations between both the countries.
Not only that, he was appreciative of the foundation of the Global Tamil Forum, the inauguration of its international work, and he called it an important moment for politics and above all politics in Sri Lanka. He also said there is no substitute for political voice in asserting political rights. Tamils know to their cost the price of violence against them and in their name. “We know that the civil war is over, but the civil peace has yet to be built and it is the dedication of this organisation to build a lasting equitable and endurable political civil peace that I think is the test of all of our effort.”
Here is the full text of his speech made to members of the Global Tamil Forum at the House of Commons on 24 February 2010:
“I want to very warmly welcome all of you to the House of Commons if you’ve come from around Britain, and welcome you to Britain, those of you who’ve come from around the world. I think that it is very significant indeed that the Global Tamil Forum should have brought people together from fourteen countries. That in itself is a huge achievement. It is a reflection of the breadth of the Tamil diaspora around the world and I hope it speaks to a unity that will serve the rights and hopes of the Tamil people in Sri Lanka.
“It’s also important to recognise the history that’s associated with Britain’s relationship with Sri Lanka. Father Emmanuel spoke about this. And I hope that not just historians, but Tamils will come to look back on this meeting in this building as being a time and a moment of significance for the future of Sri Lanka.
“I also want to recognize on the platform with me here are three Members of Parliament who have played an outstanding role in the British debate about the future of Sri Lanka. Virendra Sharma on my right, Keith Vaz, Siobhain McDonagh have all been stout defenders of the rights of all Sri Lankans and I think it is right not just to recognise the role of Governments, but to recognise the work of parliamentarians and also to recognise the work of community groups. Some of them made by Tamils, but others made by churches, made by other groups of British people who’ve seen the plight in Sri Lanka and wanted to respond to it and I think it’s important to recognise that this is a grass roots movement in Britain, not just a Government led movement.
“I also want to say that the foundation of the Global Tamil Forum, the inauguration of its international work, is an important moment for politics and above all politics in Sri Lanka, because there is no substitute for political voice in asserting political rights. Tamils know to their cost the price of violence against them and in their name. We know that the civil war is over, but the civil peace has yet to be built and it is the dedication of this organisation to build a lasting equitable and endurable political civil peace that I think is the test of all of our effort.
“I want to commend very, very strongly your decision to, not just to support non violence, but to advocate non violence. I think that history has shown time and again that lasting peace is not found through weapons and through warfare but through politics, however hard it is to persevere with it. We’ve seen this in our own United Kingdom, notably in the state of Northern Ireland, but also in other parts of the world and the road ahead no doubt will be long and hard in some ways that I will describe in a moment. But I think the founding commitment not just to a fully inclusive political process, but to support non violence as the means to achieve it, is something that speaks to the deepest values of the Tamil people and actually, as I will say later, to the deepest values of people everywhere.
“Perhaps I should say why I’m here. It’s not just that London is the venue for this important meeting. It’s that the importance of establishing a lasting peace in Sri Lanka matters. It matters because of the deep links that exist between Britain and Sri Lanka, the deep links that exist between British people and Sri Lankans of all kinds, and it’s also that the future of Sri Lanka is important for the future of South Asia more generally. And I think that any Foreign Secretary would want to be here to listen, but also to support about the way ahead.
“For twenty six years all the peoples of Sri Lanka suffered from the effects of civil war, but we know that while all communities were hit, the Tamil communities were the worst hit. We know that during the conflict Tamils were in every day fear for their lives, trapped between Government forces and the LTTE, many thousands killed we know, seventy thousand in total from all communities. Thousands more injured or maimed which often is not mentioned in a grim recitation of statistics.
“We know that civilians were displaced, individuals, children separated from their families, homes and livelihoods destroyed and we know also that the Tamil diaspora around the world reflects conflict and it reflects fear around the world. We are proud in this country, very proud, of the contribution that British Tamils are making to our country. You are our neighbours, our friends, our relatives. We’re proud of your role in business, in commerce, in politics. But you know very deeply that you would like to be making a contribution above all in Sri Lanka and it is that tension, that dual focus first of all on Britain and first of all, and secondly on Sri Lanka, that brings us together.
“It’s also important to say as Tamils lived in fear, some expelled from their country, that they, you also lived in the shadow of the LTTE, a terrorist organisation which committed countless atrocities itself, which refused to tolerate dissent, which forcibly recruited children as soldiers and which again refused to allow Tamil civilians to escape from the fighting. I think it’s important to say those things as well.
“And we know that today land mines are still scattered across the former conflict zone, the lack of infrastructure and the lack of electricity, the lack of irrigation, poverty rates in Tamil areas are at least double those in the other provinces. And after the spike in violence that preceded the end of the civil war, nearly a hundred thousand Tamils still remain in the IDP camps, unable to return to their homes. And I will never forget the faces that I saw in the IDP camps in Sri Lanka ten months ago. I will never forget the stories that I was told of innocent people separated from their families, of brutalisation and of profound fear about the future. And whenever I think of that statistic of a hundred thousand people still in IDP camps I think of individual men, women and in some cases young teenagers talking to me about all they wanted was to be treated as a decent human being, able to go about their lives in a decent way. And that’s what motivates me and it’s wha t motivates the Prime Minister and it’s what motivates the Government to believe that the aspirations of the Tamil people expressed as the hope of a decent life alongside others in Sri Lanka is something that should motivate us in the future.
“We try in the short term to alleviate the suffering. We try to send money and we do send money, tens of millions of pounds are sent from Britain by the Government. But I know many millions of pounds are sent by the Tamil communities too to try to make a difference through the humanitarian agencies who should be given far greater access and freedom of movement. We also continue to urge the Government of Sri Lanka to return the remaining IDPs to their home areas, to grant full access to NGOs and we do not forget either the eleven thousand five hundred or so ex combatants also still in camps.
“Now despite the scale of this humanitarian crisis and the need for us to focus on it as a matter of urgency, we do not forget the longer term, because anyone who cares about the future of Sri Lanka knows that it will not be built by aid alone. It must be built through a new political settlement. Since the end of the civil war, since the re-election of President Rajapaksa, as we look forward and await the parliamentary elections, we continue to make the case that the President should use his mandate for a real drive for national reconciliation, a real drive to respect the rights of every single Sri Lankan, a real drive to fulfil the commitments, constitutional and other reforms, that would make a difference.
“Now to do this there needs to be greater effort to respect the rights of all Sri Lankans. It is because of our concern about the implementation of core commitments in respect of human rights conventions that we along with twenty six other members of the European Union supported the European Commission’s recommendation to suspend Sri Lanka from the benefits of the GSP+ trade programme. We did, we did so because trade and values need to be linked. We did so because the rules of the GSP programme put values at their heart. Those values are values of civil and political rights, because we are concerned about violence and allegations of malpractice in the election campaign and of course there are also important commitments made by the Government in respect of media freedom. There is also the issue of the arrest of the presidential candidate who like anyone else arrested should be treated in accordance with Sri Lankan law.
“We also believe that as well as the GSP issue there is an issue of history because history is there to be learned from. We can not live in our history, but we have to learn from it and I think that my reading of reconciliation around the world is that if history is buried then reconciliation never happens. We have recently celebrated the twentieth anniversary of the release of Nelson Mandela and the commitment to expose history to the full glare of publicity, the commitment to reconcile history as well as reconcile people has been an important part of the South African experience and I think is an important lesson from the South African experience. That is why we continue to call as a Government for a process to investigate serious allegations of violation of international humanitarian law by both sides in the conflict. If credible and independent, such efforts could make an important contribution to reconciliation between Sri Lanka’s communities.
“I’ve also said repeatedly that the concern with civil and political rights today, concern with the history, concern with the IDPs, feeds in to a constitutional point that there needs to be a genuinely inclusive political process in Sri Lanka which involves all communities of Sri Lanka. It’s important to say that whenever a British Minister says this, there are accusations that we are trying to tell Sri Lanka how to govern or run its own affairs. I want to refute that very, very clearly, because the shape of any future political settlement is for the Sri Lankan people, all the Sri Lankan people recognising all their rights, including minority rights, it’s for them to determine. But we will continue to be an advocate for the universal human rights that we believe underpin the basis not just of democracy, but of decent societies everywhere.
“I just want to conclude on the following point. Politics is about Governments, it’s also about people, it’s about people in countries that are trying to chart a peaceful future, but it’s also about those with links around the world and that relates to the significance of today’s event. This democratic group, this heartily engaged forum is well placed to influence debate, well placed because of its commitments and well placed because of its contacts.
“And it is my view that political reconciliation will require the active engagement of Tamil communities around the world. It will require you to speak up for your values of non violence. It will require you to speak up for a vision of a decent Sri Lanka that respects all its people and it will require you to speak up for a spirit that recognises that if people can not find a way to live together they will drift apart.
“These commitments are easy to say, especially easy to say from the relative comfort of a democratic country like the United Kingdom. But it’s important that we say that we are in solidarity with all those Sri Lankans, whatever their background, who want to live up to the commitments in the Sri Lankan constitution and who want to live up to the founding ideals of a country that respects every single one of its citizens without fear or favour. The struggle for equality and democracy is one that should unite all Sri Lankans and all Governments around the world. On behalf of the UK Government I can assure you it does. Thank you very much indeed.”
-Asian Tribune-


Comments
Miliband's politics
The only really worthwhile idea expressed in Miliband's address is his reiteration that NON-VIOLENCE be the new strategy for the Diaspora Tamils. The Labor Party needs Tamil support both in terms of votes and money, and the party will do whatever it takes to mollify the Tamils while it also garners this support. That it the reality.
The LTTE and the Church together kept this conflict going so as to make the Tamil economic refugees who left Sri Lanka the source of a massive money-gathering and investment network that had no scruples insofar as to how the money was used in terms of violence - for purchase of arms and armaments against their native land and peoples. This golden goose is not yet dead and Miliband and others in the West have hopes as yet to extract what they can from the foolish Diaspora in expert Machiavellian style.
In the meantime, Sri Lankans who have had enough of all this external interference in their affairs, will seek and find ways to live together in the modern context of a common humanity, that for all the talk of Miliband et al has not been practised by them except with intent to satisfy their exploitative economics. If these resolutions are not accomplished fast enough for the liking of the Milibands et al and they persist in their barking, they will have to accept that the Sri Lankan caravan will keep moving on at its own pace.
If Sri Lankans choose to go away to other countries it is the result of economic anxiety plus island claustrophobia, but in the end they yearn for the green paddies, the tea mountains, the blue seas, white beaches and the warm climes, and they all want to come back to make things a wee bit better, each in their own way....and this holds true even for the malcontents!
Lanka bashing won't solve the
Lanka bashing won't solve the root cause of what ails some Tamil people !
Cheap Democracy
In the guise of democracy and freedom how the very fundamentals can be broken by a few. British foreign secretary is noted for his LTTE stance for a while. Seeking cheap popularity among the British Tamils he is going to this extent to promote LTTE aspirations of a Tamil Ealam is unbelievable. Thirty years of war the so called west could not contain until 9/11appeared. They did not want to understand how Sri Lankans were living in fear of their lives with LTTE groups going berserk planting bombs at will. They did the damage and also got the bogus sympathy from the west to immigrate. Now at least these people are settled abroad, leave Sri Lanka to manage its own affairs. They are not interested of the well being of Sri Lankan Tamils. Some of the human traffickers want this war to continue for their benefit. If the western countries get together and denounce terrorism and this type of propaganda to take place in their soil, they will be surprised how the other unlawful groups will use this Tamil Diaspora to meet their violent ends in the time to come.
This is no surprise.The
This is no surprise.The promoters of world terrorism always flock together.Ask this small brat to fly a kite over the London bridge.
This is a paid up speech
British FM, David Milliband, was exposed last year for having accepted money from an LTTE front. Also he is said to be dependent on Tamils in his electorate for reelection. Comparatively there is hardly any difference between polticos here and DM and DM's participation and speech at this rally had already been paid for.
It is not a bad idea to sell the status and speeches. If politicians here can do it under the constitutional provisions for freedom of speech why cannot DM do it in UK where democracy riegns supreme?
Lessons from history
These are the lessons Sri Lankans learnt from history.
1. Western nations like UK are hungry for resources and will do any mean thing to achieve its selfish ends. (See the what they did to Iraq - they got what they want - oil and got out leaving a mess for the Iraqies)
2. For 30 years they preached us to negotiate with a terrorist organization to which they provided material support.
3. Now after defeating the terrorists and a powerful government is in place with a mandate to implement a political solution to the national issue of Sri Lanka, these same nations are trying to bring it down by backing a Military Commander for the presidency. This is done knowing very well his policies will be detrimental to Sri Lanka and the region and with the intention of finding another opportunity to intervene.
4. Conclusion - Sri Lanka listen carefully and do the right thing , let these so called leaders of the west enjoy their own voice, a free drink, and hunt for votes let the misguided diaspora spend its hard earned money feeding them. If that is the life these people want it is up to them. We have better things to do - like gradually implementing the political solution and developing the economy of the country.
Please know one thing, that people of Sri Lanka are unique and west has not grasp the reality yet. They still try to use arm twisting approach. When you have a great teacher like Lord Buddha , why should we care too much about teachings of Miliband. Given the monotonous nature of these continuous utterances we have to classify them as propaganda.
Moonlighting Monkey
Ayubowan! Vanakkam!
Who asked this ‘Monkey’ for his sanctimonious advice?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/19/david-miliband-sri-l...
The Foreign Office wakes each morning and scans the world's conflicts to ponder where it might score a quick headline with a call for peace, reform, a ceasefire or "United Nations action".
Sri Lankans are unique? The
Sri Lankans are unique? The problem is that given the slightest chance, Sri Lankans will decamp to the U.K., U.S., Australia, etc. Does not this sad fact speak loud and clear? (Yes, even Miliband-hating Sri Lankans would gladly sneak into the U.K. if given the opportunity.)
As for the teachings of Lord Buddha, if Sri Lankan Buddhist-politicians had followed the precepts of Lord Buddha, Sri Lanka would not be in its current predicament that impels people like Milband to speak loud and clear.
Sri Lankans are unique and
Sri Lankans are unique and any nation is unique for that matter. Only difference is the west has not grasp the fundamentals of dealing effectively with Sri Lanka.
I am not referring to Buddhist-politicians specifically, but the teachings of Lord Buddha. So Sri Lankans better follow the principles that is ingrained in their Buddhist philosophy!
Going to UK or any other country for economic reasons is not a sin but going their and supporting terrorism, spreading falsehood is a sin according to the teaching of Buddha.