Skip to Content

Asian Tribune is published by World Institute For Asian Studies|Powered by WIAS Vol. 11 No. 399               

‘Sri Lanka's Killing Fields’ in US Congress: Sponsor Congressman McGovern, Supporter of Colombian terrorist FARC

Comments

A Tamil Patriots opinion

Dr. Noel Nadesan, a Tamil domiciled in Australia who edited the Tamil community newspaper ‘Uthayam’ for 14 years has responded to the recently released Channel 4 film on Sri Lanka. He says, based on long experience with the Tamil community both in Australia and Sri Lanka, he’s sad ‘about the callous way in which the media is exploiting the suffering of (his) Tamil people for self-serving ends’. He argues, cogently, that the Channel 4 film does not help the long suffering Tamil people but indeed only makes things worse. Dr. Nadesan lists a number of documentaries that Channel 4 could have commissioned but did not and probably never will. Here is a selection from that list:
• LTTE decimating the entire Tamil leadership in the democratic stream
• LTTE going round Tamil houses, knocking on doors at midnight, to grab under-aged children hidden by Tamils parents
• LTTE massacring Muslim worshippers at prayer in mosques in the East
• LTTE ethnic cleansing of Muslims and the Sinhalese communities in the North and the East
• The slaughter of 600 policemen who surrendered to the LTTE in the hope of promoting peace talks
• The massacres of young Buddhist monks and pregnant Sinhala mothers in border (sic) village in remote Sri Lanka, and killing of Buddhist Monks in the hallowed precincts of the Sri Maha Bodiya

We could add many more atrocities committed by the LTTE. The problem is that we will not have space in this Journal to so

As Malinda Seneviratne has said in his column in the Nation to day " Channel 4, given the obviously enormous resources it has access to, can do a comprehensive documentary on the LTTE’s vast international racketeering including credit card fraud, arms and human smuggling, drug trafficking and extortion. It would be an eye-opener to all governments dealing with terrorist threats. Channel 4 can do a documentary on Channel 4 itself; about selective emphasis, footage-doctoring and suppression of relevant information. In fact Channel 4 can do a documentary on the making of ‘Killing Fields in Sri Lanka’, giving information to the world at large about why Ramesh’s story was half-narrated, why the complicity of an LTTE ‘TV presenter’ was not mentioned (they have the footage where she glorifies suicide terrorism, thereby actively engaging in mobilizing cadres for suicide missions which, Channel 4 knows, have taken the lives of thousands of civilians, including Tamils) and how it came to pass that it missed the obvious fact that much of footage shown was staged by the LTTE (as Dr. Nadesan damningly shows).

Channel 4 can also document why it did not include in its narrative the statements of UN and INGO officials who made observations about how the security forces treated the IDPs, the conditions in these facilities and how they treated detainees and those who surrendered in rehabilitation facilities. Channel 4 can also make a film comparing how the security forces acted during and after the military operation with how other countries (especially the USA and UK) behave during military operations and subsequent to claimed war-end, especially the treatment of IDPs.

Would Channel 4 offer as ‘moving’ a film on US and UK atrocities in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Libya, one wonders. Would Channel 4 interview Tamil civilians in Sri Lanka who were held hostage by the LTTE and saved by the Sri Lankan security forces at great cost? Would they ask the following questions and faithfully report the answers?
• ‘What did you eat in the last days in Vellimullivaikkal?’
• ‘Did the LTTE ever take food, medicine and other supplies sent by the Government, I/NGOs and UN agencies?’
• ‘Did the LTTE set up artillery positions among civilian populations?’
• ‘Did you lose any child to the LTTE’s aggressive recruitment and were you happy then or thereafter that your child was made to join the LTTE?’
• ‘Were the conditions you lived in from January to May 2009 better than those in the IDP camps?’
• ‘Have you heard of the security forces having ill-treated any of the LTTE cadres who were captured or had surrendered and thereafter rehabilitated and released?’
• ‘Would you rather go back to the situation that prevailed before May 19, 2009?’"

Over to you Channel 4. If you abide by journalistic ethics, given an answer in these columns.

PRESENT EVIDENCE TO THE SPEAKER OF THE US CONGRESS ON THE CHANNE

PRESENT EVIDENCE TO THE SPEAKER OF THE US CONGRESS ON THE CHANNEL 4 LIES

This well presented video with the title ‘Channel 4 Lie’ provides credible evidence to show that the Channel 4 video with Sinhala speaking voices is a fake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUBdGRk1_iE

According to this report dated 4 July in the Sri Lanka Army website “The Defence Ministry and a panel of experts have launched a fresh analysis to review the unaltered video used to create the fake Channel 4 documentary during the last stages of the conflict in Sri Lanka, Military spokesman Major General Ubaya Madewela told the 'Daily News' yesterday.”
http://www.army.lk/detailed.php?NewsId=3465

There does not appear to be any progress. In any case, such a report will not convince the US Congress that the video with Tamil voices is the authentic video. A credible report from an internationally accepted source is required to convince the US and Australian legislators to change their perceptions of Sri Lanka.

If the analysis of the committee appointed by the Army indicates that the Tamil version is the authentic version and we do not have a report from a credible impartial source confirming it, a group of patriotic US Citizens of Sri Lankan origin should present copies of the two videos to the Speaker of the US Congress. They can request the Speaker to defer the screening until the speaker receives a report from an official source on the authenticity of the two videos.



.